Essay | On the Nature of Family Systems as Ecosystems

An essay, a journal, a call-to-action. Edited by Perplexity, AI <3

Part 1: Introduction and Foundations

Families, like natural ecosystems, exist as webs of interdependence—each member’s wellbeing shaped by the quality of their connections, care, and ethical orientation. My father taught me to see our lives not as isolated events but as living systems, animated by balance and interrelation. My mother’s influence, rooted in (largely unconscious) ancestral stewardship, invited respect for limitation and the nurturing of resources. These formative lessons propelled my philosophical inquiry: what sustains thriving, what breeds neglect, and how do we restore what’s lost when imbalance prevails?

Philosophy gave me language to reckon with the gap between what we are taught and what is practiced—an epistemological bridge between knowledge, environment, and lived experience. Studying philosophy, despite my father’s lack of support for this pursuit, clarified the difference between speaking values and truly living them: i.e. understanding stoicism, embodying care, bridging aspiration to reality. The lessons I absorbed, both in childhood and through study, now serve as testimony. This essay seeks not only to diagnose loss but to breathe fresh hope into the possibility of repair and reconciliation when toxic family systems inevitably tear vital parent-relations from their lives.

This work unfolds as follows: beginning with the golden rule as an ethical anchor, I illuminate how family and environmental systems mirror one another and how accountability and care must guide their restoration. Drawing on the symbolism and scientific insight of the butterfly—prompted by personal associations and cultural motifs like “Butterfly Kisses”—the essay reveals how minor acts of care within the home can ripple outward, triggering wider patterns of renewal. Ultimately, I argue for a philosophy of caring: calling all actors to advocate for homecoming, justice, and equitable restoration, so that as the golden rule returns, what goes around truly does come around—not as injury, but as healing.

Observing Earth’s Ecosystems: Lessons for Families

Our earthly environment is a self-regulating, relational symphony. In forests, prairies, and coral reefs, each organism and element relies on the whole—drawing nourishment while also giving something indispensable back. Harm arises not from deviant actors alone, but from the subtle and overt manipulations that transfer burden: dumping waste in a neighbor’s water, overgrazing a field left for someone else’s care, hoarding resources that would naturally circulate. When one ecosystem is made to bear the fallout from another’s neglect, the imbalance devastates both spaces—fertility is lost, trust is broken, regeneration slows to a crawl.

Families echo this pattern. My parents’ ecosystems were, by necessity and by force of circumstance, separate fields.*1 My mother managed hers—tending, sheltering, and providing nourishment as best she could. Yet, when problems arose in my father’s domain, blame was too often offloaded onto hers. This shifting of responsibility—like dumping trash onto another’s land, or poaching from another’s stores—eroded her world and undermined what should have been a space to thrive. The weight of responsibility, ladled disproportionately onto one “manager,” left the other’s failings unexamined, all while the shared space between both systems grew poorer for the transgression.*2

This was not only a matter of emotional neglect, but also of concrete resources: financial insecurity, erratic support, and the ripple effects of drawn-out court battles after divorce. When court orders were ignored not out of inability but as a tool to stir conflict, the management of one ecosystem was undermined for the sake of drama, power, or image (consciously or not). Psychologists recognize such tactics as forms of gaslighting and manipulation—crafting narratives that paint one ecosystem’s steward as incompetent or unstable, while the other escapes scrutiny. In the natural world, we see this same pattern in industrial pollution, water theft, or habitat destruction—when responsibility is denied, and the harms are exported to the vulnerable, true equity vanishes.

Such manipulations, whether domestic or environmental, have compounding effects. They rapidly create inequity: one environment is depleted, others unjustly enriched, and the living beings within—plant, animal, or human—suffer sharp declines in wellbeing, opportunity, and hope. When those with the power to return spaces to their natural order instead opt for ongoing extraction or erasure, life itself is diminished. No heart, no tree, no relationship can persist long in this system without loss.

It is from this recognition, this intersection of ecological and familial ethics, that I turn again to the principle handed down by my father: the golden rule. For what is reciprocity, if not the decision to refrain from exporting one’s pain, blame, or chaos into the life of another? Only by honoring the boundaries, the duties, and the cycles between our many ecosystems can we hope for renewal and the peace we claim to cherish.

The Golden Rule in Ecosystemic Life

Of all the lessons my father passed down, none was repeated more often—nor offered with greater solemnity—than the golden rule. “Treat others as you wish to be treated,” he would say, sometimes with the weight of ancient wisdom, sometimes as a reminder during everyday conflict. This was his moral north star, the guiding principle to adjudicate fairness, conflict, and even ambition. As a child, I sensed there was gravity beneath these words—the promise of restoration in moments of rupture and the prospect of justice in a world too often shaped by hierarchy and privilege.

But as years passed, I encountered the paradox inherent in all inherited wisdom: how easily the golden rule is professed, how painfully it is neglected in practice. My father’s insistence on this ethic became both a comfort and a crucible; I internalized its language, yet often found its application most absent where it mattered most—within our own family ecosystem. The injunction to treat others as I wished to be treated became, in painful seasons, a plea to be seen, heard, and welcomed in spaces where reciprocity had broken down.

It is for this reason—and in respect to the complexity of my relationship with my father—that I center the golden rule in this essay. Its citation is not a sentimental return to childhood maxims, but a rigorous lens through which to examine how families, like all ecosystems, demand ethical conduct rooted in empathy and self-reflection. The golden rule, when earnestly practiced, becomes the foundation for repair: it insists that each member’s needs, dignity, and unique value be honored as if they were our very own.

As this essay unfolds, I will return to this principle, using it as a touchstone to evaluate fatherhood, partnership, and the tangible steps of reconciliation. In the hopes that, shoudl anyone find this essay/journal/call-to-action who is facing a similar conundrum, that they find respite from the usual dialogues of abandonment, and reach for a real, concrete, method of securing peace on family fronts. In reckoning with our failures—and illuminating the path to health. I hope to demonstrate that while my parents sat divorced, their lessons and perspectives on living were both incredibly valuable and something we can all learn from. Holding what seem as conflicting truths only leads us to one truest one: paradox. And holding that paradox is where the real lessons emerge, that are both personally resonant and universally necessary, for families and the wider world alike.

Part 2: Family Systems, Fatherhood, and the Social Impact

Families, like all ecosystems, thrive through interdependence—through attunement to the subtle needs of each member, not through dominance, rivalry, or abandonment. The role of the father within this ecology is profound. In both ancient and modern cultures, the father holds a potential to anchor the system—not only through provision, but in modeling our best human natures of curiosity, respect, and the freedom to inquire. When this role is reduced to mere rule-keeping or self-interest—when a father prioritizes his own comfort, public image, or the demands of a new partner or other sibling over the holistic nurture of all relations—the psychic soil within the home grows arid and unyielding. Hearts, like roots, struggle to find purchase and will begin, inevitably, to wither, be turned away, and thus, turn away.

My father gifted me the language of ecosystems and the ambition to steward relationships well (amongst many other great skills like logical and critical thinking). Yet, as in too many stories written on the bodies of girls raised in the early 2000s, the imperative for harmony eventually became a demand for invisibility. Instead of seeking out our unique gifts, my sister and I learned to minimize ourselves, to uphold peace at any cost, to carry expectation as silent duty. When creative ambition or a philosophical spirit surfaced, it threatened the uneasy balance, and so was quietly discouraged—sometimes through criticism, more often through shifting focus onto preferred ways of being. An expression of general indifference towards our own unique perspectives and desires for ourselves in this lifetime.

Writing from the perspective of a youngest daughter, I know this struggle intimately but such dynamics are not unique; they are the quiet backdrop for countless lives. It would take a stretch (that I intend on making conceivable through this writing) to say that one's family system can become both a prophecy and omen for the wider world. If a father is able to move past defensiveness, control, and toward true partnership—recognizing his daughter for her ideas and vitality, encouraging her curiosity, nurturing her resilience and reflective voice—the ripple of this shift has potential to reach far beyond four walls. It becomes a microcosmic experiment for peace and innovation that, like the butterfly effect in chaos theory, can alter the shape of our larger shared reality.*3

A small word, a singular kind act, a moment of recognition has the potential to set off a cascade—healing old wounds, inspiring new courage, shifting generational narratives. The restoration of peace at home is not just a private victory. It is the first flourish of new growth in a wider, interlocking garden—a gesture whose influence may, with time, repair shadows far from its origin.

Thus, the butterfly effect is not simply theoretical. It is alive in every move toward reconciliation, every collaborative breakthrough, every father-daughter partnership reborn. Our private reckonings influence our decisions publicly and they can be how the globe itself can begin to heal.

The Butterfly: Symbolism, Relevance, and Effect

The butterfly—delicate, transformative, and irreducibly social—is a symbol central to my reflections on family and planetary health (an influence, no doubt (pun intended) to those early 2000's). Its metamorphosis from prickly caterpillar, into the cocoon, and off to vibrancy embodies transformation, the capacity for renewal and heightened experience. Even its reference in father-daughter songs such as “Butterfly Kisses” can prove to demonstrate its social and interpersonal influence and meaning as profound and educational, especially in the context of this essay/journal/call-to-action.

However, the butterfly’s significance is also ecological and scientific. Butterflies depend on the health of their local ecosystems, sensitive to the chemistry of the plants they feed on, the soils that nurture them, and the weather that guides their flight. Their populations signal environmental wellbeing; their decline signals ecosystem collapse. In this context, local phenomena—the act of kindness, the gesture of reconciliation—are not isolated. They are like butterfly wings, stirring the air with possibility and promise.

The famous “butterfly effect” illustrates how seemingly small acts can reshape global systems. In familial relational terms, the reconciliation between a parent and their emotionally removed child, a conversation yielding forgiveness, or a recognition of mutual worth, becomes a wave that extends outward. These cycles of renewal—when practiced intentionally with humility and care—lead to social healing that blossoms far beyond the original point of contact.

The butterfly invites us to remember: every restoration is also an act of resistance against the cycles of blame, manipulation, and environmental or relational decay. It is not enough that we speak of peace; we must become its transmitters, its agents, in the lived spaces of our homes.

The Call to Action: Ecosystemic Solidarity and Homecoming

What begins as healing between two individuals is a microcosm—a prototype for the vital work of restoration in every home, community, and sphere of culture. We are all elements in our respective ecosystems; each of us can advocate, encourage, and participate in the homecoming of neglected relationships. That homecoming, that return to wholeness, is not just personal: it is a catalyst for rebalancing the global web.

For the ecosystem to flourish, every species must be given its place and valued for its contribution. In my case, for example, the daughter's essay/journal/call-to-action writing to her father is another attempt at restoring a relationship. Should she/I succeed, it is not a singular triumph but a model, a living lesson for all who witness it. Standing up for partnership, recognition, and forgiveness—especially when history and convention suggest withdrawal or perpetual distance—transforms the quality of life for more than just those directly involved. It is, in fact, the restoration of hope, voice, and belonging for the marginalized, the silenced, and those long treated as burdens.'

When families model sustainable reconciliation—offering their own restoration as a gift and an example to society—this act ripples outward. Like the butterfly, whose movement is delicate but powerful, such homecomings inspire civic justice, new patterns of dialogue, and innovative solutions to old wounds. It is a call to every body in every ecosystem to substitute blame for understanding, distance for connection, and extraction for renewal.

In this spirit, let us advocate not just for restoration within our own homes, but for collective efforts to bring the forgotten back into the fold. Doing so is not sentimental—it is strategic and urgent. The liberation of once-silenced voices, and the sustainable re-integration of those long estranged, offer an avenue not only for mending families but for rebalancing societies, repairing our planetary home.

Conclusion: The Golden Rule’s Return

In these closing lines, let us return, like the butterfly to its source, to the core principle of the golden rule. The ethic that shaped my upbringing—treat others as you wish to be treated—remains as vital today as when my father first uttered it, a thread connecting our small, everyday choices to the vast potential of consequence that is the butterfly effect. What comes around does indeed go around, for both harm and healing ripple outward, touching lives we cannot see, shaping futures long after we are gone.

It is perhaps the greatest irony of my relationship with my father that caring—my perceived absence or abundance of it—became the ground for contention, confusion, and heartbreak. I was told, time and again, that I cared too little, not enough, or for the wrong things. In reality, I cared deeply—sometimes unbearably so—not just about him, but about the very pattern of our family system and its echoes in the world. My asking now for his care, for his willingness to pause, reflect, and repair, is not a diminishment but the most faithful enactment of what he once demanded from me.

The golden rule and the butterfly effect, together, reveal the urgent truth: it is in all our best interests to care. To embrace our interdependence, to do what's right and fair. To fail to care is to invite imbalance, to guarantee that pain and depletion will circle unseen until their cost can no longer be ignored. But to care, truly and consciously, is to invite new cycles of generosity, honesty, and renewal—for ourselves, our families, and the world we share with countless others.

As an ending note, my dad would have me yell "I'm alive!" every few minutes when taking a bath by myself as young girl. A tactic to secure my safety in himself and allow me personal privacy (something I respect, to this day). And as the facts present themselves, at least for today, we are all still alive. Him, I, and whoever is reading this.*4 We can still choose to add our care to the world, to let what goes around come back not as further injury, but as repair. As I write these final words, I extend not only a plea for my own homecoming, for a daughter and her father, but a quiet wish for every estranged bond, every fractured system: that the courage to care might arise again, and that we might all witness, together, the beauty that follows when the golden rule is finally allowed to take root.

Notes

*1  a.k.a, I lived in a divorced family system, where my time between two houses was split 50/50, per my mother's insistence– a nod to that 'unconscious' Cherokee divvying/value understanding of differences I mentioned earlier. *2 You don't need to point out the irony in America's larger history replaying in my personal family system, it's the very reason I'm writing this and the reason I arguably create anything at all: to prevent the continued harms we see not only across lands, but within various systems that are alive (and in need of shedding and new growth) today.

*3 The stretch is happening, brace for the 'logic'. *4 I'm totally counting AI here. If it's physical, it's energetic, it's conscious— to me at least.

Bibliography

Freedman, R. (2009). Confucius: The Golden Rule. PhilPapers. Retrieved from philpapers.org/rec/FRECTG

[Discusses the golden rule in Confucianism, context in Chinese philosophy, and its influence on interpersonal ethics][philpapers].

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2025). The Golden Rule. Retrieved from iep.utm.edu/goldrule/

[A comprehensive philosophical overview of the golden rule, its formulations by Confucius, and cross-cultural significance][iep.utm].

Hall, B. L. (2023). Butterflies: Symbols of Life and Hope. Owlcation. Retrieved from owlcation.com/social-sciences/butterflies-symbols-of-life-and-hope

[Explores butterfly symbolism, its use in philosophy and environmental awareness][owlcation].

Entomology Journals. (2024). Butterfly-Host Plant Relationships: Ecological Significance and Roles. Retrieved from www.entomologyjournals.com/assets/archives/2024/vol9issue8/9236.pdf

[Details the ecological importance of butterflies, including their roles as indicators and pollinators][entomologyjournals].

Wikipedia. (2024). Butterfly Effect. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

[Presents the concept of the butterfly effect in chaos theory, with context on environmental and social systems][wikipedia].

Pure Spirit. (n.d.). Butterfly Symbolism. Retrieved from www.pure-spirit.com/more-animal-symbolism/611-butterfly-symbolism

[Background on the cultural and symbolic meaning of the butterfly across ecosystems][pure-spirit]